An AI video editing workflow moves through ten stages: define the intended video, prepare and upload source footage, process it, analyse takes and scenes, prepare the editing plan, create the first cut, review the decisions, apply revisions, export, and approve the exact version.
The division of labour throughout: AI may prepare several connected editing decisions; the creator remains responsible for the message, accuracy, approval and publication. The system prepares the edit; you review what the video says.
Plan and prepare
Define the video. Audience, message, duration, format, tone, CTA, and any wording that must stay. A brief like "create one concise vertical first edit for business creators, preserve the current product explanation, keep the pacing natural, prepare captions for review" gives the system something to aim at. "Make this better" leaves every decision undefined.
Prepare the footage. Include what is approved and relevant; leave out the rest, because irrelevant files add processing time, source confusion, review complexity and privacy exposure. Structure and name so the review makes sense later.
Upload, process, analyse
Upload and let it process, keeping the states distinct: a failed upload, a completed processing pass and a finished first cut are three different things and should never be reported as one. Then analysis: speech, takes, visual and audio signals, cross-referenced. What comes out are possible inputs to decisions, not approved decisions. The system may spot that two takes quote different prices; it cannot know which price is current.
Plan, assemble, review
A good system exposes its editing plan: which scene uses which take, what was removed, and what it is uncertain about ("Take 4 and Take 5 contain different prices. Human confirmation required"). Then it assembles: cuts, scene order, captions, pacing, supporting visuals, rendered into something watchable end to end.
Your review runs in six passes: sources, the complete message, pacing, captions, supporting visuals, privacy. The instruction that matters most here: do not review only whether the video looks polished; review whether it is correct.
Revise, export, approve
Feedback works when it is executable: "replace the opening with take 2, shorten the pause after the first sentence, keep the full qualification in scene 3." Then export, and inspect the exported file, because the project preview and the rendered output are not necessarily identical. Finally, record what was approved: which version, which date, which destination. A technically completed render is not a publication-approved video, and "done" is not a status that distinguishes them.
Where ReadyForm fits
ReadyForm runs stages three through six without step-by-step instruction: process, analyse, plan, assemble, render. What it exposes is exactly what this workflow needs for stage seven: every scene shows its source take with alternatives, the story view shows what was cut, and the state (saved, preview current, export ready) is always visible. Stages one, nine and ten stay yours, which is the correct allocation. See how the edit is made.